Our place in the Cosmos

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shua1991

Really Active Member
I failed as a science educator, I failed even as a science regurgitator(what I really am) and you got to see that failure.



I criticized when I could have discussed, it would have exposed my own ignorance on the subject and my ego intervened, I projected weakness and ineptitude onto others as I myself contained this weakness leading to my own cognitive dissonance and inability to adequately explain these concepts and ideas to you all.


I am sorry.
 

Shua1991

Really Active Member
I failed 😞, and now the conversation is just me shouting Into the void, all over again.


Like Galileo I saw something so profound it triggered the need to know more, to expand the boundaries of my knowledge and remove obstacles caused by my ignorance.


Damn... this weed got me thinking about my symptoms/psychological barriers either societally constructed or self imposed(oh man, I can change myself at the very least) that i need to address in myself before I can teach or even help others accept these concepts or develop them further through scientific anyalysis(peer review).


My ego killed the very scientifically proven to work- peer review process....
 
Last edited:

Shua1991

Really Active Member
As a socialist I failed in my analysis,


I didnt properly use historical materialism to describe what was going on, I then failed to use dialectical materialism to further describe these phenomena for others.


The full process can lead to "Reflective disclosure is a model of social criticism proposed and developed by philosopher Nikolas Kompridis. It is partly based on Martin Heidegger's insights into the phenomenon of world disclosure, which Kompridis applies to the field of political and social philosophy. The term refers to practices through which we can imagine and articulate meaningful alternatives to current social and political conditions, by acting back on their conditions of intelligibility. This could uncover possibilities that were previously suppressed or untried, or make us insightfully aware of a problem in a way that allows us to go on differently with our institutions, traditions"



No matter if the speaker is Chinese or Amarican.


Our society relies on this process of information and it passing through proper channels and advocates, I failed to advocate this properly here and failed the entire discussion from being fruitful.


Thank you mods for pointing out my failures.
 

Shua1991

Really Active Member
2013-updated_scientific-method-steps_v6_noheader.png

This doesn't work with an overly inflated ego, it collapses.



It functions on team work and peer review process.

My ego failed the scientific method that kept it alive for years(ouch!)
 

Shua1991

Really Active Member
They are all theories because we don't have the means to prove them. Any scientist that says the science is "settled" is bought and paid for and has fulfilled the requirements for a renewall of his grant.
Words like theory aren't without a meaningful definition.


Theory of gravity(ain't there yet, tied to electromagnetism maybe?)

Theory of evolution: lots of evidence to back up the various hypothesis which point to this being true(more true than competing hypothesis).


When we have nothing but degrees of truth and explanatory power, the hypothesis which provide the greatest explanatory power are then considered "scientific theories", they provide questions to fuel further questions and further hypothesis(educated questions) helping explain facts of nature/reality. Tested over and over again via the scientific method, and then they earn a spot called theorem(scientific theory is different from modern language/meaning) this can cause confusion for those who learned the diction prior to the scientific method. An easy mistake on my end(didn't see this, ego prevented it).
 

Weedkiller

Nothing but top shelf
They are all theories because we don't have the means to prove them. Any scientist that says the science is "settled" is bought and paid for and has fulfilled the requirements for a renewall of his grant.
There were many variations of "man",plenty of evidence for that. Those that didn't die out were bred out like Neanderthal.
 
D

Deleted member 2835

Guest
@Shua1991 no wonder you think that communism is going to win...being a socialist is pretty much the same fucking thing...pinko commie bs..
If capitalism is the enemy then please refrain from any benefits involved with capitalism.
 

H.A.F.

a.k.a. Rusty Nails
There were many variations of "man",plenty of evidence for that. Those that didn't die out were bred out like Neanderthal.
True, but no "ape men". So far everytime they have come up with the so-called "missing link" (like Pitcairn Man) it turns out to be a hoax or an embellishment. You can look at certain humans alive today and see neanderthall traits. They haven't completely gone.
 
D

Deleted member 2835

Guest
True, but no "ape men". So far everytime they have come up with the so-called "missing link" (like Pitcairn Man) it turns out to be a hoax or an embellishment. You can look at certain humans alive today and see neanderthall traits. They haven't completely gone.
What about the denisovans?
 

Shua1991

Really Active Member
@Shua1991 no wonder you think that communism is going to win...being a socialist is pretty much the same fucking thing...pinko commie bs..
If capitalism is the enemy then please refrain from any benefits involved with capitalism.
Let's see if china forces america to roll out this technology fast enough to prevent societal collapse. Like soviets did with Uri Gellar and the subsequent "space race". When china has unmanned drones flying to the moon to collect tritium to collect for fusion powered nuclear then maybe we will be forced to get off our asses and stop using fossil fuels.

Americs needs a new Marshall plan, aka a "green new deal". If China spurs our economy I to action- good. We're seeing now in the article I posted. Exon and capitalists know this is real, just follow the money.

Democratic socialism works for me.

Cool, to me I prefer universal Healthcare like every 1st world nation can afford, it a shame capitalists need to charge 700 for a weeks supply of insulin so the type diabetics who suffer from insulin resistance after years of soda and poppa johns can enjoy the price of capitalism.

I understand "communism bad", but Cubans literally can achieve universal Healthcare by educating their population then we can too.


It might prevent our current illnesses from being produced via our diets/environment.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top